• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About tennesseessio

  • Rank
    2nd Team
  • Birthday 03/07/1979

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

1,050 profile views
  1. Potential Offseason Trade

    Neither do late 1sts.
  2. Potential Offseason Trade

    The 2019 pick would likely be a very late 1st and pretty inconsequential in consequence. Also we now (Ennis trade) have a total of 4 2nds coming in the next two years.
  3. Parsons, 2018 1st, Jerell Martin for Love
  4. Potential Offseason Trade

    Memphis Trades: Chandler Parsons, Jerell Martin, Top 5 2018 Pick, 2019 1st, cash Cleveland Trades: Kevin Love - So obviously this trade would be contingent on all sorts of things shaking out in a certain beneficial way. I do think its entirely feasible though, and I thought it was interesting to think about so I thought i'd share... - It looks more and more like the Cavs are going to lose LeBron James in the offseason. Thomas and Wade will be FAs as well. That doesn't really leave them with a lot. They might like to go in a younger rebuilding sort of direction. How much sense does it make to keep Love around on a bad team? They might be willing to take on 2 years of Parsons if it gets them a high-quality lotto pick in what seems like a promising top-heavy draft. Martin is a young improving player at the position they are giving up who along with an 2019 1st and some amount of cash would sweeten the bitter pill of Parson's contract. - The Grizzlies get an all-star who is ready to win right now. Love should be able to blend in with Conley and Gasol (and hopefully Evans) and make them better. Obviously getting off of Parson's poison contract is a plus. - As for Evans, I think he could be resigned. Wright + Chalmers + Ennis + Martin = about 12mil. All those contracts are coming off the books. Evans makes 3mil now so that gets him up to around 15mil. A very healthy raise but probably not quite enough, so I would propose that we trade off McLemore who would be on a 1 year 5mil contract. I think there are several lotto teams that would take him off our hands if we give them a 2nd round pick. We'd have to take back something like a conditional 2nd or a cutable low salary player. That would get us to 20mil and I think we could sign him to a long term contract (given his injury history) for around 18mil. This is what our 2018 roster would look like: Conley, Harrison, Simmons Seldon, Evans Brooks, Zagorac Love, Green, Rabb Gasol, Davis, - I think that's a team that could realistically compete for an NBA title. We'd have Big4 of all-star caliber players, and some really good young role players like Seldon, Brooks, Green, Davis. Having Love in the starting lineup would allow Marc to go back to focusing on defense, 3pt. shooting, and facilitating. Evans would be a 6th man candidate and a great closer.
  5. Carmelo Facilitation Cooperation

    Well, I'm not really in love with Zeller or anything so no need for sorrys. I just think your forgetting a few things about Wright. He is usu. injured and plays mostly against backups when he does play. I don't know about PER and Win Score, but Cody is more productive statistically than Wright. If Wright was worthy of more mpgs then he would get them, but he doesn't b/c he isn't worthy. Zeller is. The Hornets aren't really a bad team either, they're more mediocre. As for Baldwin's athletic ability you are wrong. Go back and check the numbers. Zeller is actually the superior athlete. Baldwin isn't even an average NBA athlete. I don't know why people insist on thinking that. He isn't quick, doesn't get off the floor well, and isn't explosive in any way. Zeller is quite spry and springy on the other hand. He posted better jumping numbers at the combine than Baldwin even though he's 7ft and carries 25 more lbs.
  6. Carmelo Facilitation Cooperation

    Ennis and Wright are both better than Zeller? Baldwin has more upside? Why do you think that? You must really hate Cody Zeller. He's actually pretty solid, and appropriately contracted. He has increased his ppg, rpg, mpg, and fg% all 4 years he's been in the league. I just don't get why you'd think that.
  7. Mario Chalmers returns

    You guys are overreacting to a NON-guaranteed contract. Its probably for the vet MINIMUM, too. Jeez! All this means is he will be brought into camp so they can see what he has in him still after the injury. No real HARM can come of this, only good. If we find he is back to pre-injury form than we have the OPTION of trying to rearrange the roster so we can fit him in, or we can just dump him and let some other team claim him and there is nothing lost. We may even benefit from establishing some goodwill with Rio. In fact, while there DOES exist the possibility of gain in this move there exists NO possibility of loss. Anybody ever heard of Pascal's Wager? I'm committing my chips to Rio.
  8. Carmelo Facilitation Cooperation

    Memphis Trades: Brandon Wright, James Ennis, Wade Baldwin Memphis Receives: Cody Zeller Charlotte Trades: Cody Zeller Charlotte Receives: Eric Gordon Houston Trades: Eric Gordon Houston Receives: Brandon Wright, James Ennis, Wade Baldwin - The Hornets make a lateral move to get scoring at SG. They traded for Dwight Howard and probably intend to use him, so it looks like Zeller isn't as important to them as Gordon would be. Right now their SGs are Lamb and the rookie Monk - not very imposing. - The Rockets get some expirings to use in a Carmelo trade. Wright and Ennis are 9mil combined and they can add Ariza's 7.4mil to that to make a deal happen. Baldwin could be replaced with Harrison in the deal if that's what they (or NYK) like, or Martin or Daniels could be included. We also have two 2nds next year, and I doubt with all our young players that we'd really want to use both of them. The Hornets could provide Jeremy Lamb if we take out Baldwin. So there are some versatile parts to play around with. - The Grizzlies get something really good for basically nothing. Zeller is a quality big on a good 4yrs 12.4mil contract who still has some upside. We are perilously thin in our frontcourt, Davis and Martin did not look ready in SL, and there is no guarantee Green will be resigned. Zeller averaged: 27.8mpg, 10.3ppg, 6.5rpg, 1.6apg, 0.9bpg, 1.0spg, 1.0topg, 57.1%fg, 6.79%ft. last year. Is that good enough to warrant putting Carmelo Anthony in the West? Will someone else just make it happen anyway? I don't know, but I just thought this was an interesting and plausible idea. Certainly Zeller is a good player, who would make US better. What do you think? Memphis Grizzlies: Conley, Harrison Seldon, McLemore, Daniels, Brooks Parsons, Evans, Zagorac Zeller, Martin, Raab Gasol, Davis
  9. MEM Summer League Thread

    Davis C-: He is supposed to gobble boards and rim protect. He didn't do so well with that. He seems slow to recognize whats coming at him, and I think his footspeed isn't all the great either. He isn't getting into position to make the plays we need. He had some good jump shooting games, but didn't show any offensive progression other than that. He didn't show that he could be counted on for rotation mpgs. Zagorac C: I hoped Rade would show he was ready to put his advanced skillset into the rotation year one. Sadly, he showed that coming over from Europe is harder than people give it credit for. He had trouble adjusting to the speed on the floor, and looked pensive. The pensiveness is understandable, but i'm worried about how relatively slow he looked. He was able to make some really nice passes when he got a chance to work w/ the ball, and he seemed to just know how to work the game. I just think he's a year a way from contributing. Simmons B: Looks like he has some tools. I think he showed he's worth a 2way. Baldwin D: He didn't look like a PG very often, and wasn't an effective scorer either. What is Baldwin good at? I've never known, and I'm still not sure. He did seem improved from last SL and the playoffs, but I don't see him beating out Harrison for mpgs and that isn't saying a lot. I did notice that he was a consistent contributor on the boards so that's something positive. Martin D-: 3rd year player still seems lost. He had some good games shooting and I think he plays hard, but I just can't see him stepping into J. Green's role with a BBIQ soo low. No progession, didn't show he can be counted on. Brooks B+: I'm not really a fan of Brooks', but he did as well or better than could be expected. There is a jump in competition b/t NCAA and SL, and Brooks made it. I still think he will falter jumping to the league. He makes smart instinctive plays for lose balls and at both ends and he can shoot. We shall see... Raab C-: DNP. I wanna see muh rookie. I feel cheated! I doubt i'll get to see him all season. Seldon A+: Wayne Seldon will be our starting SG next season. We already had seen him guard and play team D and finish at the rim in the playoffs and stretch run. What we hadn't seen was him knocking in 3s and breaking people down off the dribble. Well, he knocked in 3s and broke people down off the dribble in SL. He also made a lot of clever passes of the dribble which a lot of guys can't do. The shooting i'm sure will translate. I'm skeptical about him working off the dribble b/c he really is not quick. I think he mostly uses his strength and length to get shots up. Basically what we've got is a very good and proven defender who has now shown he can make 3s and maybe do more... That alone is better than McLemore, Evans, and Daniels. Of course that's not really saying a lot, but he was definitely done much more than expected in this SL. Overall B: I'm disappointed in Baldwin and Davis, and very disappointed in Martin. Rade got his feet wet and probably learned a lot, but Raab didn't get that chance so kind of a wash there. Brooks did well, but it is really just Seldon who gives the team a high grade. You could really see the improvement and you can tell he'll be a major player for us starting this year.
  10. I Think Baldwin Is Starting To Come On

    One good thing I'll say about Baldwin is that he has been gobbling up rebounds this SL. Always nice when your guards pitch in, esp. if Gasol is your 5.
  11. Hello, Dillon Brooks!

    I'm not in the Brooks fanclub. He is slow on both ends. What is he good at in the NBA? He can't defend. Okay, so he's a scorer, but is our real team really going to be looking for Dillon Brooks as a go to guy in a real game? I hope not! I think he can score against college 4s and SL backups, but not against real NBAers. I don't see him beating his man in isos in SL - not enough quickness. I don't see him finishing vs length very well either. What is he good at again, I forget? I'll give him some credit for BBIQ. He makes some smart plays out there. He'll need to make a lot of them if he wants to be an anyone's rotation.
  12. I Think Baldwin Is Starting To Come On

    People need to quit thinking of Baldwin as athletic. That's all I've heard about him since he was drafted. How great an athlete he is, how he's Westbrook lite or something. Pllaahhh! He was never athletic, he was never quick, he was never strong, he could never jump, he wasn't explosive in any way. People posted clips of him dunking as evidence of what a great athlete he was, but if you watched closely you could see he wasn't getting above average lift or explosion it was just mostly reach that was getting him to the rim. He isn't even tall for a modern PG. All he ever really had going for him were those unusually long arms. What a terrible pick. To me its worse than Thabeet who actually had some talent, but just didn't have the desire to be a professional. At least Thabeet had something going for him. I really just never saw anything good about Baldwin.
  13. MEM Summer League Thread

    Well it seems like we're both seeing him not getting involved with the offense. I just think some of that has got to be on him. If he had something to offer, he'd probably be offering something. They'd want to give him the ball, he might even demand it. I dunno, maybe it's a personality thing? I've seen him pass up a few open mid-range jumpers as well. He doesn't seem as comfortable around the bucket as i'd like either. Yeah, you're right though it is a small sample size. I could be wrong. Well shall see eventually...
  14. Which Guys should be Prioritized to Develop?

    They will all be developed. They have all been developing since they joined the team. If by "develop" you mean mpg, well then I think development has to either be earned or thrust upon you b/c of circumstance. Right now we only have 2 playable bigs on the roster in Gasol and Wright and Wright can't be counted on. So, Davis and esp. Martin (only true 4) should be getting those developmental mpgs. We just need them to be developed ASAP even though neither has really earned anything as yet. Seldon has proven he deserves his time. In real games, playoff games, and SL games he proved it. I expect he will be our starting SG. Baldwin and Harrison are in an open competition for development mpgs. Harrison is winning, Baldwin is losing. They'll get what they earn. The rest all seem to need time before they're ready to compete at the NBA level. When they show they're ready, then they can get floor time. There's no reason to trot out unprepared cubs in a real game. Some of them will lose confidence and regress if we do that. They will practice against the team and each other and in SL and GL. That is their development. When they're ready for real NBA games, then they can develop on the floor like Seldon will be doing this year.
  15. MEM Summer League Thread

    The Good: - Selden is hitting shots from all over the floor. We know already he is a good defender, now we see his shot going in... I think he will be our starting SG. - Martin had a nice 2nd game. He hit his mid-range J and boarded really well. He played hard. - Kobi Simmons looks like he is worth developing on a 2-way contract. The Bad: - Rade looks like he will take some time to develop. I was hoping he'd be more polished. Curious to see how he'll adjust as SL goes on. - Davis has no offense including FTs. He is a brick waiting to happen. I disagree w/ a lot of you about him being good on the other end. He looks lost to me. Maybe this is superficial but I don't like his laconic demeanor. He does get up really high when going for blks. The Ugly: - Baldwin has no PG sense whatsoever. He shuns physicality of all kinds. He doesn't shoot well on the move. I haven't noticed of an area of his game where he has progressed. All these qualities are innate in nature so its kinda hard to see him getting better. All the knocks on him coming out are as true now as they were then. - Brooks doesn't have the athletic ability to compete even in SL (mostly against backups). I can't figure out why we spent a future 2nd to bring him to a team w/ soo many projects already. He's not playing against college 4s anymore!